AI obsession turns the tool into the destination
You've identified a critical pattern in how organizations adopt AI: the tool becomes the goal itself. Like a tractor without a field, AI burns resources without purpose when divorced from actual problems. The real danger emerges through wha…
AI is a tractor. Point it at a field, it plows the field. Don't have a field, it just sits there burning fuel. This sounds obvious, but organizational behavior around AI right now suggests people have forgotten it.
The love potion metaphor captures what actually happens: AI acts like a self-perpetuating obsession. You adopt it because you want to solve problems faster, cut costs, do more. But the adoption itself becomes the goal. You are now measuring AI adoption, reporting on it, presenting on it, building a roadmap for it. The original problem - the thing that made AI attractive in the first place - has been subordinated to the project of having AI.
This is self-sealing. The organization is now invested in proving the AI initiative is succeeding, which means selecting metrics where success is visible, which means the original problem (even if unsolved) fades from view.
Source claim: Organizations that treat AI as a destination rather than a tool create a self-perpetuating obsession that crowds out the original problem they were trying to solve.
Related notes
- Sequential decisions are solved by working backwards from the endsubgame perfect equilibrium
- Spontaneous tool use requires knowing both the tool and its target independentlyspontaneous cognition
- HR's "trust moat" is a vendor pitch, not a defensible positionstrategic positioning
- School and real-world problems are structurally differentpractical wisdom
- HR's AI leverage is in adoption, not engineeringbusiness strategy